Obama Cap and Trade and the EPA

Ok, remember when Obama said that his cap and trade plan would necessarily skyrocket electricity rates in 2008?

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/dec/07/epa-set-issue-co2-endangerment-finding/

http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/endangerment.html

According to the book Democracy Denied by Phil Kerpen, really good book and i recommend getting it click on book to find it on Amazo BOOK (I am only on page 51 but have learned some good things from it), on page 46 he talks about the EPA issuing “endangerment finding” which would allow the EPA to add regulations to the Clean Air Act of 1970, even though Congress rejected this in 1990 but due to a Supreme Court decision in 2007 (Massachusetts v EPA) it would allow the EPA to misuse the 1970 Clean Air Act  read about that here NEWS  . You can read more from Democracy Denied to learn more about the EPA and their regulation.

Also here is a letter to Lisa Jackson, EPA Administrator, from Sensenbrenner, Issa, Vitter and Barrasso about failing to respond to a December 2, 2009 letter.  Click on LETTER to read the letter.

In 2010 here is a story saying that the EPA will regulate the coal industry starting in 2012, even though obama tried to pass the bill through congress but it failed!!!

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/obama-epa-moving-foward-with-new-greenhouse-gas-regulations/

And around the end of March, guess what is going on concerning the EPA and the coal industry

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/03/27/EPA-Power-Plant

When a president goes around congress so he can do what he wants, doesn’t that make him a dictator?  I think so!

False Statments and 1001

http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2012/04/10/false-statements-whale-watching-and-the-american-way/

H.R 3166

Scary new bill…It hasn’t passed yet but we need to make sure it stops!  The problem with this bill is when included with the NDAA (look earlier on my blog) it states “”(f) REQUIREMENT FOR BRIEFINGS OF CONGRESS.—
16 The Secretary of Defense shall regularly brief Congress
17 regarding the application of the authority described in this
18 section, including the organizations, entities, and individuals considered to be ‘‘covered persons’’ for purposes of
20 subsection (b)(2).”

Now the government can decide who is a terrorist.  As I mentioned in that post before they consider the Tea Party to be right wing extremists.  Who says the government won’t say this person is a terrorist?  Who trusts their government that much that they will do the right thing?  Some politicians won’t ever cross that line but if the DOJ wants to say someone is a terrorist then not only can you lose your citizenship but be held indefinitely in prison with no court date…What happened to the 4th amendment?  The TSA breaks that everyday at the airports!  That is why I refuse to fly!  If more people would refuse to fly then something would have to change concerning the TSA.  Some have no choice or they would get fired from their job, not sure what I would do in that situation, but I don’t have to fly for my job and will drive vs fly to keep my 4th amendment intact!  This bill has not passed yet but please email your senators and congressmen/women and find out how they will vote and make sure they know you don’t want this bill to pass!  Today you may agree with the government but tomorrow you may not and if a bill like this passes and they find out, could they not say you disagree with them and therefore are a terrorist?  We already can be put in prison by the secret service if we protest and a person with secret service doesn’t like the protesting, thus we have lost the freedom of speech and the ability to protest (I have a video below with Judge Napalitano talking about that).

http://www.govttherack.us/congress/bills/112/hr3166

Coke Pepsi and Kraft

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/kraft-latest-corporation-to-drop-conservative-lobbying-group-over-voter-id-and-stand-your-ground-laws/

time to let our money do our talking!! and contacting them doesnt hurt either

http://www.kraftfoodscompany.com/Contacts/contact-us.aspx

http://cr.pepsi.com/usen/pepsiusen.cfm?date=20120407

http://www.thecoca-colacompany.com/contactus/index.html?WT.cl=1%20&WT.mm=footer5-contactus-red_en_US

What did obama tell russia?

http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/03/26/obama-tells-russia-hell-be-more-flexible-after-election/

Gas Prices – Bush vs Obama and AAA

I saw this story today

http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2012/03/13/gas-prices-jump-50-cents-in-sacramento-area/

“‘Investors’ buying activity continues to be the dominate influence that is pushing prices higher,” said AAA Insurance spokesperson Matt Skryja in a press release. “Recent positive economic indicators in the United States and Europe have inspired investors to buy more oil and gas futures, which has helped to push up the price of oil and gas.”

So, it seems traders are pushing prices up because of this awesome economy we are in right now!

Then I started wondering, what did the AAA say about Bush when gas prices went high?

http://fuelfix.com/blog/2011/04/19/aaa-amid-high-pump-prices-more-drivers-run-out-of-gas/

“Higher gas prices may be contributing to more people running out of gas because they are trying to stretch each tank further than normal,” said Steve Mazor, manager of the AAA Automotive Research Center. “However, as painful as trips to the gas station may be getting, letting your car regularly run on an almost-empty can cause even more wallet damage with expensive repairs.”

and….

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jan/06/price-dip-adjusts-bushs-gas-legacy/?page=1

“Mr. Townsend said high prices contributed to sending the country into a recession by using up income and added that low prices could help end the downturn. “

So we have learned when Bush is in office high gas prices lead to a recession and more people running out of gas but when Obama is in office we learned investors are buying more because of the economies growth!!

Not sure they understand that “growth” could still lead to people running out of gas plus not sure they understand most Americans think they are not better off than 4 years ago.

http://www.nationalreview.com/campaign-spot/293296/mere-80-say-theyre-not-better-four-years-ago

End of Freedom of Speech

http://www.congress.org/congressorg/issues/bills/?billtype=H.R.&billnumb=347&congress=112

http://www.congress.org/congressorg/webreturn/?url=http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.R.347:

Slow Sand Filters

https://20liters.org/how/slow-sand-filters/

National Defense Authorization Act

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112s1867es/pdf/BILLS-112s1867es.pdf
PAGES START FROM 426 – 429 SUBTITLE D – DETAINEE MATTERS
JUST LOOK WHERE IT SAYS “1/926″ CHANGE THE 1 TO 426

ok, so the senate passed a bill last thursday, s. 1867. the claim is that the bill makes america a battlefield and people can be picked up and arrested without trial. i called both hutchinson (214-361-3500) and cornyn (202-224-2934). cornyns office said the bill was about terrorists and not citizens. i decided to research it. the bill that talks about it is from 426-429.
(FYI Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40) is here http://news.findlaw.com/wp/docs/terrorism/sjres23.es.html

it says on page 427
“A person who was a part of or substantially
10 supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces
11 that are engaged in hostilities against the United
12 States or its coalition partners, including any person
13 who has committed a belligerent act or has directly
14 supported such hostilities in aid of such enemy
15 forces.”

here is the department of homeland security’s assessment of the right wing terrorists (they make it sound like tea party members, even though we protest peacefully)
http://www.wnd.com/images/dhs-rightwing-extremism.pdf

now what happens to said terrorist? also from page 427
“(c) DISPOSITION UNDER LAW OF WAR.—The dis17
position of a person under the law of war as described
18 in subsection (a) may include the following:
19 (1) Detention under the law of war without
20 trial until the end of the hostilities authorized by the
21 Authorization for Use of Military Force.
22 (2) Trial under chapter 47A of title 10, United
23 States Code (as amended by the Military Commis24
sions Act of 2009 (title XVIII of Public Law 111–
25 84)).”

but they stress that it doesnt apply to the detention of u.s. citizens, lawful resident aliens or anyone else captured or arrested in the u.s. on page 428
“(e) AUTHORITIES.—Nothing in this section shall be
11 construed to affect existing law or authorities, relating to
12 the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident
13 aliens of the United States or any other persons who are
14 captured or arrested in the United States.”

let me stress again http://www.wnd.com/images/dhs-rightwing-extremism.pdf

another important factor to think about:

“(f) REQUIREMENT FOR BRIEFINGS OF CONGRESS.—
16 The Secretary of Defense shall regularly brief Congress
17 regarding the application of the authority described in this
18 section, including the organizations, entities, and individuals considered to be ‘‘covered persons’’ for purposes of
20 subsection (b)(2).”

hmm sounds like they can change “covered persons” at any time….

for those that are not worried because you dont fall into any of these categories and may even hate the tea party, think about this
“”(f) REQUIREMENT FOR BRIEFINGS OF CONGRESS.—
16 The Secretary of Defense shall regularly brief Congress
17 regarding the application of the authority described in this
18 section, including the organizations, entities, and individuals considered to be ‘‘covered persons’’ for purposes of
20 subsection (b)(2).”
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112s1867es/pdf/BILLS-112s1867es.pdf
www.gpo.gov

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112s1867es/pdf/BILLS-112s1867es.pdf

www.gpo.gov

Do You Really Know about the Mother of Planned Parenthood?

Margaret Sanger believes the greatest sin in the world is to give birth to a child that is ‘marked when they are born”.    There is a 24 second video on this site http://www.toomanyaborted.com/?page_id=592    Also on this page are PDF files of Sangers own words that you can download and read

Also she spoke to the KKK http://margaretsanger.blogspot.com/2006/10/contest-marks-80th-anniversary-of.html

Here is an interview she had with Mike Wallace, not sure of the date.  It is in 3 parts on Youtube.com

Part 1:    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=in7IUzjN3pY

Part 2:    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3U3NcCD1lg&feature=related

Part 3:    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZdwpjArFjg&feature=related    (around 2:40 is where she makes the “greatest sin in the world” statement about children)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYbUcpV36Ag   Glenn Beck interviewing Angela Franks author of Margaret Sanger’s Eugenics Legacy.